280ZX Performance / Technical Discussions related to Turbo charging, Supercharging, Engine, ECU, exhaust, and etc. performance enhancements.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

280z turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2005, 12:56 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
applemansapple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: fl
Posts: 38
280z turbos

hey i was wondering what the turbo looks like out of curiosity i have pretty much the same basic idea of what it would look like.like a turbo but these are old turbos so i was wondering what differences they have from new ones and stuff like that
applemansapple is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 10:44 PM
  #2  
The Evil Twin
 
Bleach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 9,296
Mainly the stock turbo is smaller. The overall design has been the same for years.
Some new turbos have the compressor housing polished. Of course the old Garrett turbo was not polished.
Bleach is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 10:26 PM
  #3  
lww
Head Muckraker
 
lww's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 9,221
Originally Posted by applemansapple
hey i was wondering what the turbo looks like out of curiosity i have pretty much the same basic idea of what it would look like.like a turbo but these are old turbos so i was wondering what differences they have from new ones and stuff like that
Pretty much no changes in the 'look'. Most of the changes have been in the materials and compressor/impeller wheel designes. Modern computer based aerodynamic blade designs are literally light years ahead of the old hand scratch and slide rulers used back in the 70's and early 80's.

But the external 'look' is virtually unchanged. Maybe a little polish on the compressor side for the bling.
lww is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 11:46 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Heat Rave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,075
I'd heard that modern turbos are oil-cooled while old ones weren't. Dunno how true that is though.
Heat Rave R is offline  
Old 01-06-2005, 09:32 AM
  #5  
The Evil Twin
 
Bleach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 9,296
Oh, that's another point. The 280ZX and first year of the 300ZX turbo were oil cooled. They went to water cooled later.

As for modern turbos, I was thinking water cooled is more common.
Bleach is offline  
Old 01-06-2005, 01:13 PM
  #6  
lww
Head Muckraker
 
lww's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 9,221
Originally Posted by BleachZee
Oh, that's another point. The 280ZX and first year of the 300ZX turbo were oil cooled. They went to water cooled later.

As for modern turbos, I was thinking water cooled is more common.
Definitely water cooled. Too many people back in the 80's were smoking their turbos with cooked oil by running them hard and parking without waiting for the turbo to cool down. That's why you see so many Turbo Timers on the market today.

With water cooled, this is much less of a problem.

Remember all the little 4 banger turbo cars coming out of Chrysler in the 80's?

A buddy of mine owns HPC Inc. They do 2000+ degree coatings on engines and components for race cars. Back in the 80's he landed a huge contract with Chrysler to coat all their turbos with his patented process because they were getting destroyed on turbo and engine replacements under warranty.

Water cooled is the way to go. You'll also see some people that have converted their oil cooled turbos to water cooling, but this isn't cheap either.

If you're on any kind of budget, the best thing to do is just let the motor run for another minute before you turn the key to off.

If it's just been normal driving and nothing too spirited, then even this isn't necessary. But a minute out of your life is worth a $500 turbo or worse a rebuild on the motor $$$.
lww is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 07:07 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
assimilated420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 393
ok i have a question, i have second datsun 280zx turbo that came off my dads car (my dad had 280zx back in the day..) he says its from an 82...is there any design differences between 81-82?? also, whenever i cough up th moo-la to rebuild my engine and put a twin turbo setup, should i use the 2 original turbos or purchase 2 newer ones? understandably newer ones are better and well newer but what difference am i looking at between using 2 originals and 2 new ones?
assimilated420 is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 07:47 AM
  #8  
The Evil Twin
 
Bleach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 9,296
Well, the turbo unit themselves and the entire engine in a 1981-82 280zx turbo is the same except for the distributor.

If you are rebuilding a twin turbo engine you would of course start with two freshly rebuilt or new turbos. But the question then is should you use the same size turbos that the ZX came with stock? A twin turbo engine can have a pretty high potential. Are you going for 500-600hp? If so, I believe two T3/04 hybrids would be needed.
Bleach is offline  
Old 01-08-2005, 04:20 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
assimilated420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 393
i plan on goin for around 500-600hp, so i think its prolly best i went with 2 new turbos..or maybe could i just the one i have rebuilt?? itd cost around the same i would imagine..unless i went with junkyard parts(like hell i would..only for parts that really wouldnt matter.......such as when my upper thermostat housing broke cuz the dumbass who worked on it before overtightened the bolt and completely stripped out the threads and when i tried to rethread it, only completely fell apart)

also..if i went with a twin turbo setup, would i have to get another intake? because it looks to me like the current one could support 2 intakes, only one is being hogged by that blasted EGR crap and i would think that a 2nd throttle linkage and modified accelerator linkage(or whatever the hell its called that transfers the motion from the accelerator and throttle) would work...? i dun know, just throwing ideas out there

thankx
assimilated420 is offline  
Old 01-08-2005, 04:36 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Skully's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 2,901
if you want to run 500-600 with your Z you will need work to the internals....
also a bigger turbo because the stock wouldnt do it....

if you went witha twin setup....you dont need 2 trottle bodies and a different intake....you route your piping so it joins into a Y pipe from the intercooler and into the single intake...
Skully is offline  
Old 01-08-2005, 04:42 PM
  #11  
lww
Head Muckraker
 
lww's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 9,221
Originally Posted by Skully
if you want to run 500-600 with your Z you will need work to the internals.... also a bigger turbo because the stock wouldnt do it....
500-600hp is not trivial. You'll not only need a bigger turbo(s), you'll need nearly all new engine internals, fuel system, ignition system and a new transmission which will require a new drive shaft and possibly modification to the trans tunnel and shifter location. May even need something stronger than an R200 diff.

Expect to spend in the neighborhood of $5k for a cheap job that may or may not last. To do it right is going to take much more than that unless you can build the engine and do the fabrication yourself.

You'll be running 100+ octane as well so $4-$5 a gallon is going to become familiar.

Last edited by lww; 01-08-2005 at 04:48 PM.
lww is offline  
Old 01-08-2005, 05:33 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
assimilated420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 393
well i dont think ill prolly run it up to 500 or so, that is a lil expensive for me...what i plan on doing is getting my engine rebuilt with shaved head, cylinder bore w/ new pistons, twin turbos with a good intercooler, performance cam with dual 3" exhaust straight back (none of the catalytic conv bullshit, no muffler...(oh that would sound SWEET!)) imagined getting up to about 350+ hp and i planned on dropping my auto tranny(WHY THE **** DID THEY PUT THAT IN THERE I HAVE NO CLUE..i sorta see why as i have driven it, but....no) and putting in a 5 or 6 speed tranny with a new differential(those R200s just dont seem to hold up all that well..i hear they go quite often...my dad had a 280zxt and he said he replaced it twice..perfomance car for sure...he said he ran 400hp with a single turbo and a bunch of modifications.....) that is my plan for the future.

any comments/suggestions welcome..
assimilated420 is offline  
Old 01-09-2005, 02:03 PM
  #13  
The Evil Twin
 
Bleach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 9,296
Not a bad plan but some of that seems unnessisary.
Twin turbos are only needed for 500+ horsepower.
You can easily get to 350hp with a single turbo and use the factory exhaust manifold. That will be cheaper and much more reliable. Shaving the head is not needed either. The turbo will put out all the boost you need for that kind of power.
The auto was stronger than the Nissan 5-speed in 1981. That's why the '81 only had the auto as option. The auto does have a shifting bennefit. It does have smoother shifts and the torque converter actually does something when you've got 300 ft pounds of torque. The stock auto tranny is only good for about 250 torque with stock internals.
Bleach is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 02:25 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
fairladyVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 26
All turbos are oil cooled I believe. Its just that some have the added water jackets. If there was no oil the turbo would burn up really fast.
fairladyVT is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 02:45 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Skully's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 2,901
Originally Posted by fairladyVT
All turbos are oil cooled I believe. Its just that some have the added water jackets. If there was no oil the turbo would burn up really fast.
ALL turbos run oil trough it to lube the bearing and the shaft, not just to cool, water cooling is an added bonus....
Skully is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
laynemoore
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
2
05-01-2012 10:45 AM
93twinturboZ32
300ZX (Z32) Forums
3
02-17-2011 04:13 PM
nis88300zx
300ZX (Z31) Performance / Technical
25
11-02-2005 07:53 PM
cttt300zx
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
1
12-03-2002 08:48 PM
guru22
240Z, 260Z, 280Z (S30) Forums
4
01-03-2002 09:57 AM



Quick Reply: 280z turbos



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:05 PM.