Fuel Tank Capacity?
#10
Haha - yeah. Gotta love the fact you can run 'em cheap.
I thought about putting a fuel cell in my hatch area with a separate pump and ball valve to attach it to the existing fuel system. Then fill the cell with Chevron 115-octane race fuel (only $4.15 per gallon out here!) and blamo - you can run 115 at the track, then drive home on 85-87 (depending on which station I stop at). Sound good?
Now, if only Utah would kill that stupid mandate so we can have 93 octane again ...
I thought about putting a fuel cell in my hatch area with a separate pump and ball valve to attach it to the existing fuel system. Then fill the cell with Chevron 115-octane race fuel (only $4.15 per gallon out here!) and blamo - you can run 115 at the track, then drive home on 85-87 (depending on which station I stop at). Sound good?
Now, if only Utah would kill that stupid mandate so we can have 93 octane again ...
#11
how devastating would it be to my bone stock L28 with 194,000 miles on it to fill it up with 115-octane fuel for a weekend of fun? it's never had anything higher than 89-octane. I almost did it two weeks ago, but figured I should find out the consiquences first, not possibly get stuck with no car.
#12
Originally Posted by Mooney
Just a quick question, what would be the fuel tank capacity on a 1980 280ZX, going to see what kind of mileage this thing gets.
Thanks,
Luke
Thanks,
Luke
#13
Damn! 21 gallons, wow, I figured it'd be at most 16.
I must be driving it too hard then; cause my mileage is suckin' the big one, that'd mean I'm not even getting 15 mpg... gotta fix that, this is supposed to be my economical car. My Mustang at 300 hp gets 18 on the highway!
What are these cars "supposedly" supposed to get?
Thanks,
Luke
I must be driving it too hard then; cause my mileage is suckin' the big one, that'd mean I'm not even getting 15 mpg... gotta fix that, this is supposed to be my economical car. My Mustang at 300 hp gets 18 on the highway!
What are these cars "supposedly" supposed to get?
Thanks,
Luke
Last edited by Mooney; 05-10-2005 at 05:23 AM.
#15
Originally Posted by Mooney
Damn! 21 gallons, wow, I figured it'd be at most 16.
I must be driving it too hard then; cause my mileage is suckin' the big one, that'd mean I'm not even getting 15 mpg... gotta fix that, this is supposed to be my economical car. My Mustang at 300 hp gets 18 on the highway!
What are these cars "supposedly" supposed to get?
Thanks,
Luke
I must be driving it too hard then; cause my mileage is suckin' the big one, that'd mean I'm not even getting 15 mpg... gotta fix that, this is supposed to be my economical car. My Mustang at 300 hp gets 18 on the highway!
What are these cars "supposedly" supposed to get?
Thanks,
Luke
Remember, if it's a 2+2 it only has an 18 gallon tank.
#16
the same situation was going on with my ZX. My mechanic took the fuel tank off, and cleaned out the inside. It was disgusting man. just this brownish/black ... I cant even think of a word to describe it other than utter ****. We'll see how it works now... although I dont expect to see anything different due to the sbc swap.
#17
Originally Posted by lww
Yup, something's not right with your fuel delivery. Could be running rich. You should get 20+ mpg with little problem in the stock 280ZX.
Remember, if it's a 2+2 it only has an 18 gallon tank.
Remember, if it's a 2+2 it only has an 18 gallon tank.
#18
Originally Posted by juggalo280ZX
how devastating would it be to my bone stock L28 with 194,000 miles on it to fill it up with 115-octane fuel for a weekend of fun? it's never had anything higher than 89-octane. I almost did it two weeks ago, but figured I should find out the consiquences first, not possibly get stuck with no car.
#19
I would assume if you ran higher-octane fuel, you could advance the ignition further than you could otherwise with lower-grade fuels. More advanced timing on an NA engine usually means more power - correct me if I'm wrong - so if tuned accordingly, wouldn't an otherwise stock engine be more powerful with 115?
#20
True, advancing the timing on an NA car usually yields some benefits. However, I don't know if he could advance it so far on a stock motor that it would require 115 octane. More importantly, doesn't leaded fuels damage the catalytic converter?
#22
I believe the Chevron 115 here is unleaded - but you are right, most higher octane fuels are leaded. If I remember correctly, leaded fuels tend to leave deposits and residue, especially in the exhaust.
Now, if you're like me and run a straight-pipe at the track, clogging the cat shouldn't be a problem.
Now, if you're like me and run a straight-pipe at the track, clogging the cat shouldn't be a problem.
#24
Originally Posted by juggalo280ZX
how devastating would it be to my bone stock L28 with 194,000 miles on it to fill it up with 115-octane fuel for a weekend of fun? it's never had anything higher than 89-octane. I almost did it two weeks ago, but figured I should find out the consiquences first, not possibly get stuck with no car.
It wouldn't hurt your car, but on a stock, unmodified engine you'd probably lose some power because you're car couldn't burn all that fuel. The higher the octane rating, the harder and slower the fuel burns. you raise octane to prevent detonation and what not. Uping octane doesn't up horsepower, it just allows your engine to have a higher HP because it allows more fuel in with all the extra air a high HP engine takes in.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zpeedracer25
240Z, 260Z, 280Z Performance / Technical
3
10-30-2016 08:06 PM
280zinkansas
240Z, 260Z, 280Z (S30) Forums
0
04-27-2004 11:26 AM
Bookmarks