280ZX Performance / Technical Discussions related to Turbo charging, Supercharging, Engine, ECU, exhaust, and etc. performance enhancements.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Supercharge Ad at the top of the forum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2004 | 12:42 AM
  #1  
DarrellBuddy321's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 318
From: Daly City
Supercharge Ad at the top of the forum

Does that even work? The Ad on top of the forum
Old 12-07-2004 | 02:20 AM
  #2  
Heat Rave R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,075
From: Bay Area, CA
Assuming it's one of those metal things you stick in your intake to "spin" air into the manifold, I was thinking of getting one from Pepboys for when I dyno my car, to definitively prove whether it does/doesn't work. If it doesn't, I can simply return it.
Old 12-07-2004 | 10:32 AM
  #3  
newb81280zx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 99
Yea let us know. I also am interested if these things actually work...at all.
Old 12-07-2004 | 11:56 AM
  #4  
Dorifto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 788
From: Layton, UT
This is hilarious. The fact that they sucker so many people into thinking their vehicle is ACTUALLY supercharged is down right idiotic. I was talking to this kid the other night, and he was showing off his Accord (which I must say, was very well executed). We were engaged in a conversation about power-adders (turbos, sc, nitrous, etc.) and he told me his Accord had a belt-free supercharger. Looking at the outside of the car and it's general rice-free appearance, I figured he had a Jackson Racing charger or something, but when he said belt-less, I thought he meant turbo.
Nope.
Cone air filter, and a "Tornado" intake thingy, sitting right there on his throttle body. It completely caught me off guard, because the kid knew what he was talking about with everything else, but he truly believed that this intake add-on was actually a belt-less supercharger. I almost cried in laughter.

I would assume the power gains are negligible, hardly even seen by the dyno. Just my thought though, who knows how much they really do add. But for $70, I'd rather be refilling a nitrous bottle, or running 115-octane race fuel.
Old 12-07-2004 | 12:42 PM
  #5  
apollo's Avatar
Pro Pumpkin Carver
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,160
From: Oakland Cali-****en-fornia
Originally Posted by Dorifto
I would assume the power gains are negligible, hardly even seen by the dyno. Just my thought though, who knows how much they really do add. But for $70, I'd rather be refilling a nitrous bottle, or running 115-octane race fuel.
My thoughts exactly. I would rather spend that 70 on something a little more substantial than that.
Old 12-07-2004 | 01:47 PM
  #6  
91zxtt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,672
From: Gerber, CA
We had this discussion in the Z32 section.

https://www.zdriver.com/forums/showt...hlight=Tornado

Another gimic
https://www.zdriver.com/showthread.p...c+Supercharger

And another
https://www.zdriver.com/showthread.p...ght=turbonator
There's a link to 300zc that elaborates a bit more. I never saw this before, but they talk a bit of trash about zdriver on there. A-holes. :badpc: They kiss my hairy beanbag.
Old 12-07-2004 | 02:37 PM
  #7  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
I wonder if it would help carbureted engines more? Fuel injectors mist the fuel out very well, but the carb needles could use some more air circulation to atomize the fuel better. Intake manifolds are cast rough for a reason. To keep the air from being too stagnant.
I've seen those commercials for the Tornado. They put it in a late model Suburban and claimed that right there on the dyno they got 12hp increase at the wheels.

To say it is like forced induction is rediculous. All it could possibly do is help with the fuel mixture in the air for a more clean burn.
Old 12-09-2004 | 02:05 AM
  #8  
bigjoe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 36
From: Brisbane, QLD, AUSTRALIA
humm seen a much better device

Originally Posted by BleachZee
I wonder if it would help carbureted engines more? Fuel injectors mist the fuel out very well, but the carb needles could use some more air circulation to atomize the fuel better. Intake manifolds are cast rough for a reason. To keep the air from being too stagnant.
I've seen those commercials for the Tornado. They put it in a late model Suburban and claimed that right there on the dyno they got 12hp increase at the wheels.

To say it is like forced induction is rediculous. All it could possibly do is help with the fuel mixture in the air for a more clean burn.
People an aussie company make a hiclone filter. It sits on top of the carbbie and alters the air pattern to maximise its movement throught the carbie.

Don't know about the benefits with efi motors but if it does work you can add it into a turbo motor.
Old 12-10-2004 | 12:18 PM
  #9  
theramz's Avatar
I have a present for you...
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,695
From: dayton, nevada usa
Super B.S.

I've seen this sort of crap on ebay. The key to the BS is they are made out of abs plastic. Most of them don't mention the cfm. The ones that do boast 250 cfm, not enough to blow a lawn mower. Non of them mention boost. Non of them show dyno results. Turbulence in the intake actually slows the flow. Another key to the SCAM is they keep their feedback private.
Old 12-10-2004 | 10:19 PM
  #10  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
We're not even talking about the electric superchargers, its the fins that just set in the intake pipe to spin the air as it is sucked past.
Old 12-11-2004 | 12:36 PM
  #11  
Skully's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,905
From: Saskatoon, SK
lol i love this
"The Turbonator is much less expensive and more efficient than any turbocharger, supercharger, blower, or intercooler"

right....lol....i mean how do they have a nerve bullshitting, honestly...how the HELL is it more efficient when it does nothing...sombody should sue for false advertising.!!!

yes why spend 500 ona turbo when you can get something more efficient for 70 dollars....now that i think of it why are turbo's even so expencive when this is more efficient...hmmm.....i should sell my t04 and buy this ....
Old 12-12-2004 | 11:05 PM
  #12  
Las VegaZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 160
I'll wait for the true dyno numbers before I say it does or doesn't work. Sometimes the wierdest things do work. Take aftermarket intakes for example, a local shop dynod a couple intakes and the difference was amazing. The K&N even though it is thinner than any other intake still made more power than some leading brands, and the one they made from the ones that Autozone sells still made more power than the AEM. If all it does is make as little as a 1/2 hp then it works. IMO I have seen tuners try everything from smaller injectors to actually blocking half the intake just to find that little extra edge. Look at race teams, they spend hours to days looking for something, anything to shave less than a 10th off there times
Old 12-13-2004 | 08:29 AM
  #13  
theramz's Avatar
I have a present for you...
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,695
From: dayton, nevada usa
All good theories, I'll wait for some real feedback with actual dyno tests.
I'm betting on hell freezing over first.
Old 12-14-2004 | 11:24 AM
  #14  
e_racer1999's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 54
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by theramz
I've seen this sort of crap on ebay. The key to the BS is they are made out of abs plastic. Most of them don't mention the cfm. The ones that do boast 250 cfm, not enough to blow a lawn mower. Non of them mention boost. Non of them show dyno results. Turbulence in the intake actually slows the flow. Another key to the SCAM is they keep their feedback private.
turbulence may slow the flow of incoming air, but for those of us with SU carbs, turbulence is a good thing. with carbs, we don't have the fuel atomization that FI cars have, we have to rely on turbulence to get the proper mixture. as a matter of fact, the SU carbs create turbulence on purpose.

as for the tornado, it straightens the flow and puts a spin on the air. it is actually a good idea with a valid point, but not for $70. make my own out of beer cans for that much... AND have beer to go with it! :chug:
Old 12-14-2004 | 08:49 PM
  #15  
theramz's Avatar
I have a present for you...
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,695
From: dayton, nevada usa
Where's the damn dyno sheet?

The difference between our SUs and FI is it is almost a straight shot to the intake valve with carbs, the venturis increase the velocity and atomizes the gas there. FI has to make a 90 degree turn but the gas is atomized just before the intake valve. Turbulence is when the outer edge of the flow can stall and even reverse flow. The suggestion that it is a tornado spinning tells you that the middle of the flow is stalled just like the eye of the storm.
I see that a lot of members were not yet born when they tried this in an adaptor that went under the 4 bbl carb in the 70's. It didn't work then either! $70 buys a lot of beer!
Old 12-14-2004 | 09:59 PM
  #16  
91zxtt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,672
From: Gerber, CA
Originally Posted by theramz
I'm betting on hell freezing over first.

That's a safe bet.
Old 01-19-2005 | 01:09 AM
  #17  
Heat Rave R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,075
From: Bay Area, CA
Welp, I had a dyno session with my NA '82 Z this weekend. For one of my runs, I thought I'd try out one of these "Tornado" things you stick in the intake to see once and for all whether it does anything. On my first 2 runs, I ran without it and discovered I've got a bad lean condition. On the last and 3rd run, I put the Tornado in my MSA intake. It sure did something alright! It caused an even more severe lean condition! Whatever it was doing, it caused a greater ratio of air vs. fuel to happen, which implies it is indeed getting more air in somehow. However, the greater lean condition also meant I lost more power. Still, I think that once I get my fuel issue addressed, I would try it again and see what happens.
Old 01-19-2005 | 08:41 AM
  #18  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
...Just like a TURBOCHARGER! Wow!!!
Old 01-19-2005 | 10:52 AM
  #19  
theramz's Avatar
I have a present for you...
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,695
From: dayton, nevada usa
Still no proof!

Maybe instead of more air you got less gas. A vacuum gauge will tell if your getting more air. Less vacuum means more air. If it does indeed increase the amount of air then I think you will need a tuneable engine management system to keep from frying your engine which by itself would give you more HP over the entire rpm range than the wannabe Turbo. Go tuners!
Old 01-19-2005 | 09:26 PM
  #20  
s/cL3.0's Avatar
Bleach is my Hero
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,293
Originally Posted by DarrellBuddy321
Does that even work? The Ad on top of the forum
Every one look at boosthead.com what do you think about that???
Old 01-19-2005 | 10:45 PM
  #21  
theramz's Avatar
I have a present for you...
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,695
From: dayton, nevada usa
These are the only electric turbos that produce any boost. They have real turbos driven by very powerful motors. They also require big auxilary batteries that are good for about 15 seconds and then need to be recharged. The other drawback I see is that you cannot control the boost with any engine management system I've heard of. Your engine will not last long without controls. By the time your done it will cost you as much as a real turbo.
Old 01-19-2005 | 10:51 PM
  #22  
s/cL3.0's Avatar
Bleach is my Hero
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,293
Originally Posted by theramz
These are the only electric turbos that produce any boost. They have real turbos driven by very powerful motors. They also require big auxilary batteries that are good for about 15 seconds and then need to be recharged. The other drawback I see is that you cannot control the boost with any engine management system I've heard of. Your engine will not last long without controls. By the time your done it will cost you as much as a real turbo.
yeah definetly, There like 1295.00 too. For 2800.00 I can get the s/charger kit from jim cook racing, but I am still holding out til there finished with the multi-port setup.. :hpydance:
Old 01-20-2005 | 08:59 AM
  #23  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
For less than that supercharger you can rebuild a stock L28 trubo and buy a brand new T3/04!
Or buy the Tornado thing for $60 or so and it'll add about 175hp!!!!
Old 01-20-2005 | 07:25 PM
  #24  
assimilated420's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 393
From: Houston TX
i hope youre seriously not implying the tornado deal is going to add 175hp..
Old 01-21-2005 | 11:28 PM
  #25  
91zxtt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,672
From: Gerber, CA
Um, no,...he's not.

Sarcasm 101, class is in session,...please take your seats.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 PM.