280zx Top speed?
#1
280zx Top speed?
What is it? for a N/A and a turbo?
Were the T-5 transmissions any different?
I have small tires on mine (previous owner put them on) so my car is running 2 thousand rpm at 50 mph in fifth gear... I don't think thats too good lol
Were the T-5 transmissions any different?
I have small tires on mine (previous owner put them on) so my car is running 2 thousand rpm at 50 mph in fifth gear... I don't think thats too good lol
#2
I've got an '81 nonturbo 5 spd and it has P195/60R14's on it and I've gotten mine up to 125 mph @ roughly 5500 rpm's. My aerodynamics are all messed up so maybe it's capable of a higher speed (darn rust and smashed air dam). I've also stripped the interior and put on a cold air intake and some hi-po spk plg wires. I got this measurement from drivin next my buddy in his 2001 eclipse.
#4
Hai l00k guyz!!! It's a previous HUGE thread on 280zx top speed: https://www.zdriver.com/forums/showt...ight=top+speed
#6
Have to say I was on I-70 racing a Cobalt SS and before we had to slow down to make our turn I really didnt know how fast I was going sence well the speedo only goes to 80 so once we stopped at at stop light I had to ask what our speed was. The other driver said we were at 140. I have to say I also had some more left under the pedel. Mine is also an N/A 5spd. I can only go off his word but I know it sure was fast and fun.
#8
know whats funny, i looked up the old geo-cities speed calculator and it said the 5speed from the 77-79Z is all the same and so is the rear end so its basically saying my speedo should have been correct (though it was not i know for a fact driving past those radar signs the police setup) and it also said with that combo of tranny and rear end my car would do 193mph at 8k rpm. yeah.... right.... i have my doubts about that program now.
#14
the MGB isn't nearly as nice looking as the midget IMO. the midget has way cooler lines and when it's lowered on panasports, it looks bad-****. the british car click is a very hard to understand one, seeing as the cars are known for being slow and unreliable, but i love them.
#15
so u do 2000 rpms at 50 mph huh? sounds normal. i got 16 inch rims with nittos onm them. in fifth gear i am doing 25 mph at 1000 rpms 50 at 2000 rpm 75 at 3000 rpms 100 mph at 4000 rpms 125 at 5000 rpms. my car has been clocked at 138 lol it was the P.O.
#17
Here's the deal on why the Bitish car. I bought a new MGB in 1977. Still have it. Would say it's mint but it's in great shape with 33k miles on it. You can drive these cars at slow speeds and still have an xuberating drive.
It's all about the feel of the road, responding curves and corners, whith the stick **** in your hand, with the top down and the wind in your face. In no way is it about speed. It's about the art of the drive.
It's all about the feel of the road, responding curves and corners, whith the stick **** in your hand, with the top down and the wind in your face. In no way is it about speed. It's about the art of the drive.
#24
this is a cool car:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triumph_GT6
my dad had one supposedly, the Mk2 kind
didnt get ruined by rubber bumpers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triumph_GT6
my dad had one supposedly, the Mk2 kind
didnt get ruined by rubber bumpers
#25
that is a bitchin car. i love it. almost got one. i think the mark 2, although not plagued by rubber bumperettes"", it suffered from the rotoflex u-joints in the half shafts. big power decrease i think.
this is a similar car that is overall more desireable. i REALLY almost had one of these. i couldn't afford a new car though.
http://www.motorbase.com/vehicle/by-id/82045368/
many of the same components as the GT6 that you mentioned
this is a similar car that is overall more desireable. i REALLY almost had one of these. i couldn't afford a new car though.
http://www.motorbase.com/vehicle/by-id/82045368/
many of the same components as the GT6 that you mentioned