280ZX (S130) Forums Dedicated to 79-83 ZCars

Horsepower Calculation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2012 | 08:35 PM
  #1  
campfirestring's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 76
Horsepower Calculation

My '81 280zx N/A should be putting out 145 net HP stock. I've got:

Header
Straight pipe, no muffler
Cool air intake
-100 pounds weight redux.
20 Degrees BTDC timing
93 Fuel

BUT: according to my calculations, I'm only pulling about 100 HP

This is the formula I'm using:

HP = Weight/(ET/5.825)³

Does this sound right to you guys? My ET is about 18 seconds, but I've only clocked it once. It was a pretty rough estimate, because I was using my trip gauge and stopwatch. so I may bring in better/ worse timing the next time I clock it.

Even with my rough results, I'm pretty sure I should be showing higher HP. What have I overlooked? I'm too poor to take it to get dyno'd. Is something just probably wrong with my engine? I'm going to buy a compression gauge tomorrow.
Old 07-26-2012 | 09:06 PM
  #2  
ThaPimpShrimp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 548
From: Foresthill, California
I do not know anything about your calculations or how you're coming up with them, but in case you didn't know, there is a difference between the Engine Horsepower and Wheel Horsepower. All cars lose power from the crank out on its way to the wheels.

Now, onto your lower horsepower figures.. I have no idea how old your engine is, how many miles it has on it, when it has been rebuilt etc, but over time and miles engines wear in many places which slowly causes a reduction in horsepower. Cylinder wear, pistons and rings, valve guides, camshafts, rocker arms etc, and all of those small things together add up.

Your modifications aren't huge so I wouldn't expect to see too much gain, and nothing surprisingly noticeable.
Old 07-26-2012 | 09:15 PM
  #3  
campfirestring's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 76
That formula is just something I found online... I was hoping someone could tell me if it looked legit. I'm pretty sure it's solving for wheel HP, but I'm not sure.

So, yeah stupid question.

But, the engine is 31 Years old. 160,000 miles. Pretty sure it hasn't been rebuilt. You really think age alone could reduce me down to 100 HP?

I know my mods aren't very substantial, I'm just adding them so you know what's going on.

Thanks

Last edited by campfirestring; 07-26-2012 at 09:21 PM.
Old 07-26-2012 | 09:29 PM
  #4  
ThaPimpShrimp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 548
From: Foresthill, California
Originally Posted by campfirestring
That formula is just something I found online... I was hoping someone could tell me if it looked legit. I'm pretty sure it's solving for wheel HP, but I'm not sure.

So, yeah stupid question.

But, the engine is 31 Years old. Pretty sure it hasn't been rebuilt. You really think age alone could reduce me down to 100 HP?

I know my mods aren't very substantial, I'm just adding them so you know what's going on.

Thanks
If the 100HP is WHP then yes I'd say that could be somewhat accurate because that 145HP rating is for the engine horsepower (I believe)..

Of course the only way to really find out your car's WHP is to shell out $50 or so and get a Dyno run done!
Old 07-26-2012 | 09:34 PM
  #5  
campfirestring's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 76
Well I know the 145 is "net" horsepower... that sounds like RW to me, but I could be wrong...

Thanks, that's the sort of answer I was looking for!
Old 07-26-2012 | 10:50 PM
  #6  
NismoPick's Avatar
The Good Twin
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,639
From: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Both "net" and "gross" hp are flywheel measurements:

Horsepower - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SAE gross power
Prior to the 1972 model year, American automakers rated and advertised their engines in brake horsepower (bhp), frequently referred to as SAE gross horsepower, because it was measured in accord with the protocols defined in SAE standards J245 and J1995. As with other brake horsepower test protocols, SAE gross hp was measured using a stock test engine, generally running with few belt-driven accessories and sometimes fitted with long tube (test headers) in lieu of the OEM exhaust manifolds. The atmospheric correction standards for barometric pressure, humidity and temperature for testing were relatively idealistic.

SAE net power
In the United States, the term bhp fell into disuse in 1971-72, as automakers began to quote power in terms of SAE net horsepower in accord with SAE standard J1349. Like SAE gross and other brake horsepower protocols, SAE Net hp is measured at the engine's crankshaft, and so does not account for transmission losses. However, the SAE net power testing protocol calls for standard production-type belt-driven accessories, air cleaner, emission controls, exhaust system, and other power-consuming accessories. This produces ratings in closer alignment with the power produced by the engine as it is actually configured and sold.
If you don't have $50 to spend on a dyno, you don't have $50 for mods... drive the car and be happy, or make more money to spend.
Old 07-27-2012 | 11:06 AM
  #7  
FricFrac's Avatar
Mr Z++ Wiki
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,195
From: Victoria, BC
Dyno is really just for tuning and see how mods affect performance. If you dyno your car and it tells you you have 104rwhp what does that mean to you?
Old 07-27-2012 | 07:35 PM
  #8  
campfirestring's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 76
haha guys, I just want to know! when you get something new to you, it's natural to look it over to know where to begin. The more I know about what I don't have to fix or replace, the less money I will spend needlessly as I slowly improve performance. I'm only interested in mods for curiosity's sake. lol I don't even RACE! I'm not even one of these punk kids who thinks they know **** about cars... so humor me, please.



BTW: my cylinder compression is (1 thru 6) 160, 160, 170, 160, 170, 170. good enough to not need a rebuild, right?
Old 07-27-2012 | 11:26 PM
  #9  
SHADY280's Avatar
Big Poppa
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,499
From: Mission, British Columbia
Pressures are where they should be. Your engine is fine. Try putting in a new blaster 2 coil and a good set of plugs and wires and a fuel filter. I found those to make the most difference over stock. Then go to a night drags or test and tune and weigh your car there and get real numbers and you will be able to get near the exact rwhp figures
Old 07-27-2012 | 11:54 PM
  #10  
NismoPick's Avatar
The Good Twin
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,639
From: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
PPK posted his dyno results a while back. New exhaust and a few other things... 113whp stock, to 130whp with mods:

https://www.zdriver.com/forums/280zx...z-28955/page6/

Originally Posted by PurePontiacKid
dyno results are in!!! had a NICE gain in the power department from last year, as well with the torque. The power band is also quite a bit wider as well. my car sounded SO NICE at 6500rpm on the dyno

results comparo:
112.91whp/145.42wtq
130.49whp/152.31wtq
Old 07-28-2012 | 05:40 PM
  #11  
campfirestring's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 76
Thanks shady, will do.

Nismo, his exhaust is what got me. I lost it. lol
Old 07-28-2012 | 10:07 PM
  #12  
pete8717's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 513
From: Gering Nebraska
Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure your timing is way off. If memory serves me right it's supposed to be set at 8 degrees btdc. That may be causing a lower power issue. I was running the same mods as you except mine wasn't straight piped however the cat was eliminated and I was running a 16.429 at Autoclub Dragway with 183,000 miles on my motor.
Old 07-29-2012 | 01:27 PM
  #13  
campfirestring's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 76
Well, I very well could be at 16.5. lol it was a VERY rough run.

I'm at 20' because shady suggested it on another topic, haha.

I wasn't too surprised by my time, because even by manipulating it in within my formula, it still came out to 100-ish rwhp. I was more concerned about whether or not my formula was legit.
Old 07-29-2012 | 03:28 PM
  #14  
FricFrac's Avatar
Mr Z++ Wiki
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,195
From: Victoria, BC
20 deg is for the turbo engine
Old 07-29-2012 | 08:17 PM
  #15  
NismoPick's Avatar
The Good Twin
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,639
From: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Shady is running 20* BTDC, but he has a lot done to his n/a motor. ~10*-15* would be about max for a stock n/a.
Old 07-29-2012 | 10:41 PM
  #16  
FricFrac's Avatar
Mr Z++ Wiki
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,195
From: Victoria, BC
Shady isn't quite stock
Old 08-04-2012 | 07:35 AM
  #17  
SHADY280's Avatar
Big Poppa
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,499
From: Mission, British Columbia
hehehehe, you can do it on any l28e. just make sure you have good gas (91+ octane) and listen for ping
Old 08-04-2012 | 05:35 PM
  #18  
FricFrac's Avatar
Mr Z++ Wiki
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,195
From: Victoria, BC
What is the "all in" total advance optimal for the L28ET? I was talking to a guy in the know about the L16 and he says all in you don't want more than 32 deg but part of that is the displacement (eg area across the piston).
Old 08-06-2012 | 10:44 AM
  #19  
SHADY280's Avatar
Big Poppa
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,499
From: Mission, British Columbia
all in for most motors is 36-38 deg. That said it can vary depending on the rest of the variables. I know with my n47 head I couldn't do that much timing at all. I could do 30-32 deg max without ping and 94 octane.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GTH
280ZX (S130) Forums
15
05-20-2011 01:19 PM
1990300zx1990
300ZX (Z32) Forums
31
07-01-2006 11:11 AM
VandiL
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
29
04-17-2006 10:37 PM
Samz
280ZX Performance / Technical
18
10-02-2003 12:32 PM
lonito
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
1
01-21-2002 12:06 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:48 PM.