280ZX (S130) Forums Dedicated to 79-83 ZCars

Straight 8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2006 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
y2daniel1981's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 309
From: Tulsa, OK
Straight 8

So anyone know if anyone has stuck a straight 8 in a 280zx yet? I know where I can get one (the straight 8 engine) for $150 in running condition.
Old 10-20-2006 | 06:06 PM
  #2  
skittle's Avatar
Taste My Rainbow
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,418
From: LOST VEGAS
Out Of What Kind Of Car???
Old 10-20-2006 | 06:37 PM
  #3  
y2daniel1981's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 309
From: Tulsa, OK
I want to say from a Buick but I dont remember, I know it's a flat top. I'll ask him Monday (and also ask about this sweet centrifugal s/c and maybe if I can get them together for even a better deal since he's closing his shop in November).

I know for sure I'll have to move the radiator forward and maybe knock in the firewall some.

Last edited by y2daniel1981; 10-20-2006 at 07:07 PM.
Old 10-20-2006 | 08:17 PM
  #4  
hoov100's Avatar
Ruff Ryder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,140
From: palm desert
99% of the time its to tall....with a stock crossmember..
Old 10-21-2006 | 09:12 AM
  #5  
y2daniel1981's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 309
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally Posted by hoov100zx
99% of the time its to tall....with a stock crossmember..
I wouldn't doubt it'd be too tall with the stock cross member. But half the fun is making something work, right?
Old 10-21-2006 | 11:52 AM
  #6  
hoov100's Avatar
Ruff Ryder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,140
From: palm desert
Originally Posted by y2daniel1981
I wouldn't doubt it'd be too tall with the stock cross member. But half the fun is making something work, right?
but making an entire crossmember from scratch, then making a tranny crossmember, then having to modify the tranny tunnel to fit the bigger trans, then you have to make a custom drive shaft, then you still have to modify the hood, make custom engine mount, custom rad. support.....etc to much work for to little gain..
Old 10-21-2006 | 12:08 PM
  #7  
duckyz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 903
From: Alameda, CA
A straight 8? Yeah, old Buicks had them. BIG *** engines. Even if you do get it to fit, I think the motor would stick up too high to even see the road, and the tranny would come out of the middle of your dash!!
Old 10-21-2006 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
wreckedj30's Avatar
No Club Love
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,518
From: Mo Valley, So Cali
yeah plus there slow, you should use that motor as a well pump or cement pump. That'd work. They are torquy sob's though.
Old 10-21-2006 | 08:23 PM
  #9  
y2daniel1981's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 309
From: Tulsa, OK
Now all i need is a well!

Plus they dont like high revs anyway
Old 10-21-2006 | 10:08 PM
  #10  
hoov100's Avatar
Ruff Ryder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,140
From: palm desert
any american motor is going to be a low RPM motor, WAY to much stroke..
Old 10-22-2006 | 02:11 PM
  #11  
turbot5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 65
From: Florida
typical weekend tread, a 70 year old technology, not to mention weight, MPG, parts, etc etc..from sublime to ridiculos..yeah! why not an RX8 will be too easy
Old 10-23-2006 | 10:27 AM
  #12  
BoulderZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 474
From: Boulder, CO
Hudson made one, too. And maybe Studebaker? Heavy and slow, but really cool. Make for great Godfather type rides. I know where you might get one for free: there's a junked Hudson with a straight 8 near Death Valley, in the next drainage west (Panamint Valley?) North of the Manson ranch, at Aguereberry Mine. Of course, it's been sitting there for at least 60 years, and it's missing the head, but hey...
Dave
Old 10-23-2006 | 11:55 AM
  #13  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
I know... forget about dropping in a readily available and more reliable Chevy 350 with better weight distribution. Just put a crappy old 1940's technology engine in there. Heck, a KA24DE would have more power than that load of crap!
Old 10-23-2006 | 12:09 PM
  #14  
wreckedj30's Avatar
No Club Love
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,518
From: Mo Valley, So Cali
yeah if it was built it would be close, well with a ka motor. i've heard of 300+ horses for a straight 8.
Old 10-23-2006 | 03:31 PM
  #15  
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
Über User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,532
From: lemont, Illinois
yeah..if i ever get my s30.... wanted to swap an RB25 or 26..then looked into 2jz motors...and the motors with trans and ecu's are ridic especially since a bunch of them will need a rebuild, and parts.....ugh....so i think even though i want a straight 6 still in it...am considering the sr as a possiblity or mabye just an l28et....but the SR will be easier to mod and more mod friendly and its gonna be lighter....so im starting to see the upsides to it.....sigh....still though
Old 10-23-2006 | 03:48 PM
  #16  
jfairladyz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,485
From: Temecula, CA
Just drop in a V8.......................and tell people its a straight 6

I do like the SR idea though. Sure you're not going to have the low end grunt of one of the larger 6 cylinder motors. But I've seen a couple S30's with SR's (not personally, just vids ) and they haul with a few mods to the engine. You gotta figure that stock, an SR (any SR) makes more power then an L28ET, costs significantly less then an RB or 2JZ and a good deal of it's maintanence parts are available stateside due to earlier Sentras running a FWD SR20. And on top of that the SR-into-a-240SX craze has parts for those motors available at the click of a mouse. Sure some would say it's taking a step backwards what with losing two cylinders. But if it makes the car faster and retains the reliability then hell, why not? Oh and it's still Nissan

Then theres the twin turbo 13B out of the FD RX7...

I'd still rather go the V8 route rather then swapping anything other than an L series into a Z. Bang for the buck it's the way to go.
Old 10-23-2006 | 03:53 PM
  #17  
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
Über User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,532
From: lemont, Illinois
i odnt want v*...i still enjoy gass mileage...and they are heavier...and i donnt like how most of them sound...nad rotary is a great idea...but if you drive it liek you stole it you gotta replace the apex seal often and they like to blow gaskets of all sorts.....still a light small motor with high revs and great HP throw outs (193 hp per litter N/A)
Old 10-23-2006 | 03:56 PM
  #18  
jfairladyz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,485
From: Temecula, CA
if you had to choose between one of the motors you listed I'd choose the SR for the fact that you'll have the potential to enjoy your Z without having to sell both of your future kids in the Phillipines just to finance and maintain that endeavor Plus the SR has more real world support here in the states. There are more people who actually deal with them on a daily basis to give you factual information rather then the handful (if that) of RB owners here in the states.
Old 10-24-2006 | 03:00 AM
  #19  
lww's Avatar
lww
Head Muckraker
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 9,221
From: Bay Area
Originally Posted by snwbrderphat540
i odnt want v*...i still enjoy gass mileage...and they are heavier...and i donnt like how most of them sound...nad rotary is a great idea...but if you drive it liek you stole it you gotta replace the apex seal often and they like to blow gaskets of all sorts.....still a light small motor with high revs and great HP throw outs (193 hp per litter N/A)
Let's not go down this path. An LS1 with tranny is only about 80lbs heavier than the L28ET with tranny. You relocate the battery to the back and it's a wash.

The low rpm torque of the SBC is undeniable.

The RB is a $15k exercise and as mentioned, very little KNOWLEDGEABLE support in the states.

However, if I wasn't going to do an RB and I didn't want to do a V8, I'd just MegaSquirt my L28ET and pull 250 whp and 250+ torque out of it with virtually no mods and be done with it. L6 low end torque and stand alone ECU turbo fun and you can do it cheaper than an SR20DET swap...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
robz32
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
12
11-19-2006 06:26 PM
waterdogzx
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
3
05-25-2005 07:20 PM
300zxBoi
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
3
03-31-2004 12:56 PM
Tuuurbo
280ZX Performance / Technical
7
11-24-2003 12:47 PM
DANZAMAN
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
2
09-08-2002 11:55 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:42 PM.