350z Vs 300zx
#1
350z Vs 300zx
From the two witch one has the most Potential as far as HP goes? I would think the 300 just because it's already Turbocharged. I just keep hearing that the 350 has so much Potential. I have a 300 so im bias anyway, i just want to hear what you guys have to say.... I'll post the same question on other forums too, to get a general feel..
Last edited by c-murder; 05-23-2005 at 10:12 AM. Reason: info
#2
I'm not too sure, but I would say that the 350 has the most potential. I say this because it's literage is higher, so more potential right there. The 300ZX is already turbocharged, whereas the 350Z is not, so I feel that with 298 hp stock, the 350Z could achieve more horsies.
#4
Old Polish Lady Lover
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 156
From: Cheektowaga, NY...land of nothing but a mall and 10,000 old Polish ladies
i'll go with what i've seen...and i may have not seen it all, but what i do know is that there are SEVERAL 300zx's out there, totally street legal, putting over 600hp to the wheels...and the most i've ever seen or heard come out of a 350 or a g35 for that matter, was about 400wheel...
plus, IMO, the 300zx 1990-1996 was the best looking car Nissan has ever produced...the 350 is hot, as is the g35 coupe...but they aren't near as sporty...
plus, IMO, the 300zx 1990-1996 was the best looking car Nissan has ever produced...the 350 is hot, as is the g35 coupe...but they aren't near as sporty...
#6
I've heard this statement from numerous sources, including a relative that works at nissan north america: The factory VQ35 motor is pretty much maxed as designed and built by nissan. Greddy & Stillen know this and that's why they're only building low boost aftermarket products.
imho, Liter to liter, the 3.5 has more potential, but it'll take more cubic dollars to get 500 h.p. out of a VQ35 than a VG30. I was talking to a guy at the msa show with the stillen s/c........... he said it adds a whoppin' 80 h.p.
And, one of those arguments on turbo-ing an n/a car, greddy builds their turbo kit for a motor with stock 10.3:1 c/r. I haven't heard about any of them blowing up.
imho, Liter to liter, the 3.5 has more potential, but it'll take more cubic dollars to get 500 h.p. out of a VQ35 than a VG30. I was talking to a guy at the msa show with the stillen s/c........... he said it adds a whoppin' 80 h.p.
And, one of those arguments on turbo-ing an n/a car, greddy builds their turbo kit for a motor with stock 10.3:1 c/r. I haven't heard about any of them blowing up.
#7
The 300zx was designed to withstand the rigors of turbocharging and boost. The internals were already beefed up from the factory enough to handle high horsepower. The 350Z cannot handle much boost without a major buildup. Also I think the 300 looks so much damn sexier. I'm not really too fond of the 350's bubble butt look. Nissan should have kept the low, wide, sleek look IMO.
Last edited by ZXDude90; 05-23-2005 at 02:12 PM.
#8
pretty much boils down to how much money you are willing to throw at it. theres 4 bangers out there pushing 1000hp, but that takes some serious bucks. there are more aftermarket parts for the z32, and its already set up for forced induction, so you can probably push quite a bit more out of it without having a tree that grows $100 bills in your back yard. that, and i have to agree with everyone who said the z32 is the best looking z. the z33 just never made me drool like the z32 did.
#9
I'll take a TT Z32 over a 350. honestly Z32 have so much more potential just because it was produced when the companies where more about performance not money. now it's more money and emitions. Z32 all the way baby. 350Z is stilla nice car though.
#10
Z32>>>>Z33
for the unlimited bank account you could have a serious arguement between the two but for the average joe, it's the Z32 all the way.
Overcoming the dead serious ECU obstacle that the Z33 presents is it's most serious flaw and challenge. A simple intake is all that would be needed to make a stock Z32 TT better than a stock Z33.
for the unlimited bank account you could have a serious arguement between the two but for the average joe, it's the Z32 all the way.
Overcoming the dead serious ECU obstacle that the Z33 presents is it's most serious flaw and challenge. A simple intake is all that would be needed to make a stock Z32 TT better than a stock Z33.
#15
Originally Posted by ZXDude90
The 300zx was designed to withstand the rigors of turbocharging and boost. The internals were already beefed up from the factory enough to handle high horsepower. The 350Z cannot handle much boost without a major buildup. Also I think the 300 looks so much damn sexier. I'm not really too fond of the 350's bubble butt look. Nissan should have kept the low, wide, sleek look IMO.
#16
Originally Posted by LUKassZ
Granted the VG30's rods are forged, it has nothing to do with its internals being "beefed up"! It can handle more boost because it has a 8.5:1 compression ratio vs. the 350's 10.3:1 ratio.
#17
one of my first posts ever.... "there's no replacement for displacement." The fact is that if you build two relatively equal motors, the larger displacement motor is faster. imho, The people with money, that want to, can easily put 8.5:1 pistons in a vq35 and then boost the hell out of it, The bottom end, technology wise, is prolly as strong, or stronger that the vg30.
As I said, I'll take one of each.
As I said, I'll take one of each.
#22
Originally Posted by sya11
well i have not seen a 350z with as mutch to the wheels as i do the most i seen well heard about was 550 to the wheels and they ant touching my 875 wheels so the z32 has so mutch more potential.
Come again??? Are you saying you have 875 RWHP?