300ZX (Z32) Forums Dedicated to 90-96 ZCars otherwize known as the Z32's

Fng

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2006 | 08:22 PM
  #26  
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
Über User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,532
From: lemont, Illinois
i think you ment... Phat cash....Phat with a ph....liek my name....lol...thats how you know your cool
Old 10-13-2006 | 07:44 AM
  #27  
Comorat2x2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 352
Originally Posted by snwbrderphat540
anyways..im a people person, people like me....lol
and im not a Z'tard at all....sometimes i just dont know when to close a thoguht and try to "elaborate" and end up making no sense....or, saying somehting dumb unintentional.....i think its some type of disease....

It's ADD. lol The good news is it's treatable with a perscription, the bad news is it isn't medical weed.
Old 10-13-2006 | 08:28 AM
  #28  
z-hag's Avatar
Queen of Yachts
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,957
From: warmspott, trollville.......somewhere sailing the seas--fla, virgin islands...wherever....warm water....LOL
hi, ng--so, you have one of the z32 na type z's, eh?? i have 1 na and 2 turbo z31's. the na is fun, but the turbos are waaaayyyyy funner!! welcome. have fun learning here--you will learn a lot. might get a little razzing, but that's all in good fun and frolic.
Old 10-13-2006 | 09:39 AM
  #29  
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
Über User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,532
From: lemont, Illinois
Originally Posted by Comorat2x2
It's ADD. lol The good news is it's treatable with a perscription, the bad news is it isn't medical weed.
haha...i do have ADD...but no more meds for it...had to get rid of them before i started to become a pilot, so they werent on my med record (the perscription) for my medical and student license....and never can have them again.
and z-hag funner isnt a word...momre fun, lol just messin
Old 10-13-2006 | 11:06 AM
  #30  
ZKruser94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7
From: minneapolis, mn
Looking to get more into road or i think its autocross. there was a group of older guys with there vettes that would get to gether and race in a big parking lot that was temp turnd into a track where i used to live. wasnt old enough to get into it then though. not so much competitive drag racing but i wouldnt pass up a day at the strip.i've done full exhause headers to the mufflrs alum fly wheel one piece drive shaft cold air and i have and afc neo that i would like to get hooked up and dyno tuned but dont know any of the shops in town either. ignorance is bliss isnt it
Old 10-14-2006 | 07:10 AM
  #31  
Comorat2x2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 352
Originally Posted by z-hag
hi, ng--so, you have one of the z32 na type z's, eh?? i have 1 na and 2 turbo z31's. the na is fun, but the turbos are waaaayyyyy funner!! welcome. have fun learning here--you will learn a lot. might get a little razzing, but that's all in good fun and frolic.
I find my slightly lower RWHP offsets the higher maint costs of a turbo in the fun area Money is fun too.
Old 10-14-2006 | 11:10 AM
  #32  
emo236's Avatar
confuzed member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,074
From: Salinas, CA
Originally Posted by Comorat2x2
I find my slightly lower RWHP offsets the higher maint costs of a turbo in the fun area Money is fun too.
slightly? under 200rwhp compared to 400+rwhp.....not even close....you're talking fast car vs. mediocre power outputs.
Old 10-15-2006 | 07:39 AM
  #33  
Comorat2x2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 352
Originally Posted by emo236
slightly? under 200rwhp compared to 400+rwhp.....not even close....you're talking fast car vs. mediocre power outputs.
Under 200? It turned 230 at the rear wheels with new airfilters and an oil change a couple years back when I tossed it on the dyno just for giggles. We were checking out the car my dad and his buddies were building for Boneville, now TYHAT bastard cranked out a cool 731.....it was insane, but that's what 80k in engine gets you....

Anywhoo....under 200? Since when? Now granted, 230 isn't throwing me back in the trunk when I jump on it but my car is far from mediocre.
Old 10-15-2006 | 10:40 AM
  #34  
b300z's Avatar
caught the z fever
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,518
From: Lafayette, IN
230? how? theres no way if youre completely stock. heavily modded n/as dont even get to 230rwhp
a good condition stock n/a should be in the low 190s

Last edited by b300z; 10-15-2006 at 10:43 AM.
Old 10-15-2006 | 03:56 PM
  #35  
emo236's Avatar
confuzed member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,074
From: Salinas, CA
Originally Posted by Comorat2x2
Under 200? It turned 230 at the rear wheels with new airfilters and an oil change a couple years back when I tossed it on the dyno just for giggles. We were checking out the car my dad and his buddies were building for Boneville, now TYHAT bastard cranked out a cool 731.....it was insane, but that's what 80k in engine gets you....

Anywhoo....under 200? Since when? Now granted, 230 isn't throwing me back in the trunk when I jump on it but my car is far from mediocre.
OK, I don't know what kind of dyno you were testing on, but I assure you, it was incorrect. the STock specs for an NA (AT THE FLYWHEEL!) is 222hp. There's no way you have more than what a perfect condition motor would have at the flywheel at the wheels. No way. Like b300z, 190s is typical for a GOOD running NA. IF you have 230rwhp, I'd like to see what kind of motor you have in your NA. I garuntee it's not a stock VG30DE.
Old 10-16-2006 | 10:32 AM
  #36  
ZKruser94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7
From: minneapolis, mn
Oh boy what have i started i was just lookng to get into racing not open a dark burning rift between the na and tt owners there is no debate that the tt is can produce big number better thn the na thats forced induction for ya any engine can make good nums using turbos or sc'rs because of the huge increase in valumetric efficientcy. so tt na what ever we all still drive a Z and that puts us in a class of our own!

you smell that...smells cheezy
Old 10-16-2006 | 11:54 AM
  #37  
wreckedj30's Avatar
No Club Love
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,518
From: Mo Valley, So Cali
Originally Posted by emo236
I garuntee it's not a stock VG30DE.
Duh.... it's a stock vg30e. The de's were around 215. Gotcha there.
Old 10-16-2006 | 02:05 PM
  #38  
emo236's Avatar
confuzed member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,074
From: Salinas, CA
Originally Posted by wreckedj30
Duh.... it's a stock vg30e. The de's were around 215. Gotcha there.
you sure? Might want to do your research.
http://auto.consumerguide.com/Auto/U...arreviewspecs/
http://twinturbo.net/ttnetfaq/stats/mtjune91.html
everywhere you look, it says 222hp.
Old 10-16-2006 | 04:17 PM
  #39  
wreckedj30's Avatar
No Club Love
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,518
From: Mo Valley, So Cali
I thought we were talking about the foot pounds of torque. But yeah and i thought those numbers were to the flywheel.
Old 10-16-2006 | 11:18 PM
  #40  
emo236's Avatar
confuzed member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,074
From: Salinas, CA
Originally Posted by wreckedj30
I thought we were talking about the foot pounds of torque. But yeah and i thought those numbers were to the flywheel.
yes, 222hp to the flywheel. There's no way that you could dyno 230hp to the wheels when the specs are 222hp to the flywheel. Due to drivetrain loss, you'll always lose hp when going from the flywheel to the wheels.
Old 10-17-2006 | 12:11 PM
  #41  
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
Über User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,532
From: lemont, Illinois
ugh^^^ the only advantage to front wheel drive...which is why they made mid engine cars....whihc in turn are incredibly hard to work on
Old 10-18-2006 | 07:37 AM
  #42  
Comorat2x2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 352
Originally Posted by emo236
OK, I don't know what kind of dyno you were testing on, but I assure you, it was incorrect. the STock specs for an NA (AT THE FLYWHEEL!) is 222hp. There's no way you have more than what a perfect condition motor would have at the flywheel at the wheels. No way. Like b300z, 190s is typical for a GOOD running NA. IF you have 230rwhp, I'd like to see what kind of motor you have in your NA. I garuntee it's not a stock VG30DE.

I dunno and belive me I'm not trying to use this as some sort of "mines bigger than yours" thing. I'm just stating what I know to be as accurate as what I saw personally. Kinda wish I had kept the ticket from the dyno now....oh well.

As for my engine, it's as stock as it gets for a 13 year old car. Some parts have been replaced but nothing in the "performance" field to be sure. I suppose I could take a picture of my engine once I get it cleaned

Bottom line is I love what I drive




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:09 PM.