300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical Discussions related to Turbo charging, Supercharging, Engine, ECU, exhaust, and etc. performance enhancements and Techical related.

injen intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:07 PM
  #1  
hxc251's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15
injen intake

ive read that there is no such thing as a short ram on the 300z, can someone please give me some insight on the injen short ram. i was thinking of getting it but not too sure if i'll have to put in a maf adapter for the cone

http://www.autoanything.com/air-inta....aspx?kc=ffsku
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:17 PM
  #2  
Mrmoose's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 106
It already has a maf adaptor... Short rams are ****, and only for na engines that need air rammed into the motor. On a turbo car they are useless, not to mention the relocating of the intake results in hotter intake air temp. Which is very bad you want the intake air as cold as possible for max power!
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:25 PM
  #3  
hoov100's Avatar
Ruff Ryder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,140
From: palm desert
Short ram intakes are a scam. All the kit is in that link are hard pipes to the TB's and a MAF adapter. I wouldn't waste a dime on anything engine related, other then to improve mpg or reliability on an N/A z32.
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:25 PM
  #4  
hxc251's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15
i just got the car and it still has the factory airbox and the air filters are almost straight up black, i didnt want to spend money on the airbox so i was just going to put in a cone, it didn't seem like it had the maf adapter on it. what intake would you recommend on putting on then?
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:33 PM
  #5  
Mrmoose's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 106
Just replace the filters with good ones, if it's a na an aftermarket filter won't make a noticeable difference...
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:42 PM
  #6  
hxc251's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15
yeah its an na, not even a pop charger will make that much of a difference?
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:47 PM
  #7  
ZLover4Life's Avatar
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,316
From: Naperville, IL
Don't listen to Mrmoose - there are noticeable gains for an NA.

And get JWT POP. It performs better than all others, and costs the same (or often less).
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:49 PM
  #8  
hxc251's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15
so should i just leave the stock pipes on there and get a pop?
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:53 PM
  #9  
Mrmoose's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 106
Originally Posted by ZLover4Life
Don't listen to Mrmoose - there are noticeable gains for an NA.

And get JWT POP. It performs better than all others, and costs the same (or often less).
You can honestly say an average driver will notice a difference on a na car just by upgrading to a jwt huh? I never said there were no gains, just no noticeable diff with JUST a filter. Besides a Mildy louder car and slighty, oh so slightly better gas mileage a filter won't do squat he could notice.
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:59 PM
  #10  
ZLover4Life's Avatar
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,316
From: Naperville, IL
Originally Posted by hxc251
so should i just leave the stock pipes on there and get a pop?
Yes. Changing the intake pipes for others of the same diameter is purely cosmetic (and larger diameter pipes are only useful on TTs).

Originally Posted by Mrmoose
You can honestly say an average driver will notice a difference on a na car just by upgrading to a jwt huh? I never said there were no gains, just no noticeable diff with JUST a filter. Besides a Mildy louder car and slighty, oh so slightly better gas mileage a filter won't do squat he could notice.
If you didn't notice a difference in power, it's because your engine has other issues that are draining power... such as vacuum leaks. A healthy NA (the only kind that anybody should be modifying, and yet are rare because most NAs weren't taken care of) will yield noticeable gains.

P.S. Only a narrowminded ricer would think that peak horsepower is the only useful benefit of a modification... the fatter powerband (and thus more responsive engine) is a real-world noticeable benefit of a less restrictive intake.

Last edited by ZLover4Life; 02-21-2011 at 07:04 PM.
Old 02-21-2011 | 07:03 PM
  #11  
Mrmoose's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 106
Ok we shall see, get the jwt filters bud. Keep us posted and let us know if you feel a difference.
Old 02-21-2011 | 07:04 PM
  #12  
hxc251's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15
i got a '95 n/a, with 95k miles on it, it was in a storage for the past couple years before i got it. im getting the transmission swapped to a manual hopefully next month, a lot of people have been saying to just sell it and get a tt but i want to keep it. not really sure what to work on first
Old 02-21-2011 | 07:14 PM
  #13  
Mrmoose's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 106
If you are looking to modify for power, sell it and get a tr for sure. If you just want a nice car I would say keep it, put a good suspention set up on it and drive the crap out of it.
Old 02-21-2011 | 07:16 PM
  #14  
hxc251's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15
its in such good condition that id feel robbed if i sold it.
Old 02-21-2011 | 07:18 PM
  #15  
ZLover4Life's Avatar
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,316
From: Naperville, IL
Originally Posted by Mrmoose
Ok we shall see
Your skepticism amuses me, given your post history ("should I put the same turbo as my Ford Ranger on my Z32?" and "how can I tell the difference between TT and NA heads?" come to mind - both demonstrating ignorance to the Z32).

I can find much more testimony than this - http://www.twinturbo.net/net/viewmsg...&forum=general

Increases in performance due to the ECU, intake, and exhaust are certainly noticeable, however they are completely overshadowed compared to any upgrades in a TT.
http://www.twinturbo.net/net/viewmsg...&forum=general

I had an NA for 7 years, and went from stock to all the bolt ons.
[...]
I would recommend going with the ud pulley, single pop intake, and a master cylinder brace. I think these parts give the best all around driveability and performance improvements for your dollar.
Sorry, but you have much research to do before anybody considers you to be an authority on modifying these cars.

Gains on a TT are obviously more substantial (there's even a 20rwhp gain on an otherwise stock TT by going from single POP to dual POP), but that doesn't imply that the NA's gains are not noticeable.
Old 02-21-2011 | 07:29 PM
  #16  
hxc251's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15
zlover thanks for the links, thats exactly what i was looking for but just couldnt find it, i appreciate all the help
Old 02-21-2011 | 07:38 PM
  #17  
Mrmoose's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 106
Yeas an you who has never worked on a na z32 should have all the answers... The holset on my ranger has been used on the z31 with great success, similar to the gt30r turbocharger. And I asked opinions not "should I put on"

and again about the gains I was talking about a filter only, obviously gains are noticeable when more than a few are done...
Old 02-22-2011 | 12:02 AM
  #18  
hoov100's Avatar
Ruff Ryder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,140
From: palm desert
Originally Posted by Mrmoose
Yeas an you who has never worked on a na z32 should have all the answers... The holset on my ranger has been used on the z31 with great success, similar to the gt30r turbocharger. And I asked opinions not "should I put on"

and again about the gains I was talking about a filter only, obviously gains are noticeable when more than a few are done...
And me have owning three N/A's and having worked on more then I can count, agree's with Zlover. They are similar, but thats as far as it goes. They are not the same, nor will ever be the same regardless of how "similar" they may seem. Lastly there is no way in hell to compare a z31 against a z32, it's like comparing 63 vette to an apache helicopter. Quit being a dumbass, do a some reading and get back to us when you actually know your way around z's.
Old 02-22-2011 | 06:25 PM
  #19  
ZLover4Life's Avatar
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,316
From: Naperville, IL
Originally Posted by Mrmoose
Yeas an you who has never worked on a na z32 should have all the answers... The holset on my ranger has been used on the z31 with great success, similar to the gt30r turbocharger. And I asked opinions not "should I put on"

and again about the gains I was talking about a filter only, obviously gains are noticeable when more than a few are done...
As a n00b, I wouldn't expect you to know that I worked at Ultimate Z, nor that a (now former) friend of mine bought an NA after I had my TT, etc etc etc

The first philosophical imperative is to not speak about things of which you have no knowledge. I'm pretty sure you don't know **** about me, and you don't know much more about NA Z32s.
Old 02-22-2011 | 11:19 PM
  #20  
NismoPick's Avatar
The Good Twin
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,639
From: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Old 03-05-2011 | 09:11 PM
  #21  
S_R_A_M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Has anyone tried a short ram air intake with the JWT POP? I have recently aquired a 93 N/A and love it (my first z). I have done some research on the venturi effect in my Machine Design Class, and i understand how it can increase the efficancy of air flow. The POP is a on its way, but is it a good idea to combo it with an intake? Thanks
Old 03-05-2011 | 09:14 PM
  #22  
hoov100's Avatar
Ruff Ryder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,140
From: palm desert
Originally Posted by s_r_a_m
has anyone tried a short ram air intake with the jwt pop? I have recently aquired a 93 n/a and love it (my first z). I have done some research on the venturi effect in my machine design class, and i understand how it can increase the efficancy of air flow. The pop is a on its way, but is it a good idea to combo it with an intake? Thanks

Old 03-05-2011 | 09:51 PM
  #23  
ZLover4Life's Avatar
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,316
From: Naperville, IL
Originally Posted by S_R_A_M
Has anyone tried a short ram air intake with the JWT POP? I have recently aquired a 93 N/A and love it (my first z). I have done some research on the venturi effect in my Machine Design Class, and i understand how it can increase the efficancy of air flow. The POP is a on its way, but is it a good idea to combo it with an intake? Thanks
Please post back after you receive your POP charger. Then you'll see how unnecessary your question was.
Old 03-07-2011 | 07:35 PM
  #24  
S_R_A_M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
I would rather ask then waste the money. Thanks for the input.
Old 03-07-2011 | 07:50 PM
  #25  
ZLover4Life's Avatar
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,316
From: Naperville, IL
Originally Posted by S_R_A_M
I would rather ask then waste the money.
Originally Posted by S_R_A_M
The POP is a on its way
Sounds to me like you've already ordered a POP charger. When you receive it, you'll (hopefully) realize your question was dumb.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
racinz
FS: 350Z / 370Z (03+)
0
02-26-2014 10:34 AM
nismo613
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
7
08-21-2005 12:18 PM
NISMO92300ZX
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
5
10-28-2002 10:40 PM
zxpilot
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
2
05-24-2002 01:44 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:29 AM.