JWT INTAKE vs INJEN
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
JWT INTAKE vs INJEN
i purchased an injen intake for my 92 NA in august...i am yet to receive it and i am cancelling my order ( N2Zoomn.com = deadbeats) i have seen a lot on the JWT pop-charger and i am wondering if it is better than the injen. so my question is what is the best intake available for the 92 na, and also, do hard pipes make any difference (aside from aesthetically)
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: JWT INTAKE vs INJEN
i would have to disagree and say go with the injen intake. i know jim wolfe makes really good parts and all, but to me an intake is an intake they all do the same thing, and the injen is alot nicer looking under your hood and it sounds alot deeper than those other filtercharger intakes because it comes with tubes. i think you should go ahead and cancel the order on the one you have, because that is rediculous to wait that long. i ordered my injen intake from ptuning.com and there was no shipping charge and it came very quick.(i ordered it on wednesday and i had it on the car that friday) it is a little more expensive than the other intakes, but in my opinion it is worth it, don't go the cheap route.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bookmarks