I6 maxima engine question (gasser)
05-19-2010 | 05:32 PM
#1
Thread Starter
eff good grammar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,578
From: Deadford OR
I6 maxima engine question (gasser)
i couldnt find this on maxima.org for some reason but i thought i would ask here
the L24e used in the maximas, are they a smaller bore and/or a shorter stroke than the L28?
i know the block is basicly the same aside from very minor things like dipstick location and what not but i cant remember if it was both smaller and shorter bore and stroke or just one of those 2.
the z engines started out with the L24 and did longer stoke and bigger bore through out the years to wind up at 2.8 right?
some thing in my mind tells me that it was different on the l24e and i cant figure it out
the L24e used in the maximas, are they a smaller bore and/or a shorter stroke than the L28?
i know the block is basicly the same aside from very minor things like dipstick location and what not but i cant remember if it was both smaller and shorter bore and stroke or just one of those 2.
the z engines started out with the L24 and did longer stoke and bigger bore through out the years to wind up at 2.8 right?
some thing in my mind tells me that it was different on the l24e and i cant figure it out
05-19-2010 | 05:46 PM
#2
The Good Twin
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,639
From: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/enginedesign/
L24 = 2.4L 83mm bore
L28 = 2.8L 86mm bore
The smaller the number, the smaller the liter, which = smaller bore.
L24 = 2.4L 83mm bore
L28 = 2.8L 86mm bore
The smaller the number, the smaller the liter, which = smaller bore.
05-19-2010 | 06:06 PM
#3
Thread Starter
eff good grammar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,578
From: Deadford OR
yes i know that the number designates displacment.
i still think theres something still a bit different about the bore or stroke of an L24e in a rwd maxima
it'd be interesting if it had an L28 bore but a shortened stroke for make up for the difference of the .4L i bet it'd be alot smoother that way, mabe a bit more revvy
but the seccond half those aussies are helpful for, i couldnt remember when going to the L26 if it was a bigger bore or longer stroke.
i still think theres something still a bit different about the bore or stroke of an L24e in a rwd maxima
it'd be interesting if it had an L28 bore but a shortened stroke for make up for the difference of the .4L i bet it'd be alot smoother that way, mabe a bit more revvy
but the seccond half those aussies are helpful for, i couldnt remember when going to the L26 if it was a bigger bore or longer stroke.
05-19-2010 | 09:32 PM
#5
The Good Twin
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,639
From: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Select your block:
L24 height = 207.85
L28 height = 207.85
Crank stroke:
L24 = 73.7
L28 = 79
I HIGHLY doubt Nissan made "special" internals for one block. Bleach is right... an L24 is an L24.
05-24-2010 | 05:04 PM
#7
Thread Starter
eff good grammar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,578
From: Deadford OR
hrmm really, i might want to buy that. we'll see if its still available when i sell the blazer from hell.
one transfer case swap and it'll be on the market....assuming its a good transfer case (at 77k/mi i should be good).
mabe we should start a service manual swap some place, i've got like 2 '79 280zx FSM, an '84 PickUp 1st rev. FSM, '87 Maxima FSM and 200sx (RWD style) FSM some place
one transfer case swap and it'll be on the market....assuming its a good transfer case (at 77k/mi i should be good).
mabe we should start a service manual swap some place, i've got like 2 '79 280zx FSM, an '84 PickUp 1st rev. FSM, '87 Maxima FSM and 200sx (RWD style) FSM some place
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lheggS130
280ZX Performance / Technical
0
01-26-2013 01:24 AM
nikitenko91
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
21
11-15-2007 05:03 PM
Bookmarks
